|
|
Updates
Project
updates and clarifications - last update September 29, 2004
To
receive an e-mail notification of updates: Send
an e-mail to westvillage@ucdavis.edu
with "Subscribe to West Village updates" in the
subject line.
| Date |
Question-Response |
| September
29, 2004 |
Will
the city of Davis be involved in the approval process for buildings?
What will the city's role be once the project begins development?
The Regents of the University of California approved the master
plan and will retain all approval authority for development
on university property. No action by the city is required to
implement the project.
The campus may partner with the city for some public services
including building inspection if determined to be in the interest
of both parties.
|
| September
24, 2004 |
Are
there any pre-qualification requirements for the Mixed Use/Student
Housing and Faculty/Staff Housing projects? If so, is there
a list of pre-qualified entities for the West Village Request
for Qualifications?
There
are no pre-qualification requirements, and thus no list of
pre-qualified entities for the West Village project. The process
is open to all interested parties who comply with the submittal
requirements set forth in the Request for Qualifications.
|
| September
17, 2004 |
Has
there recently been a lawsuit filed against the Board of Regents
regarding this development? I read a press release that said
they would be filing another suit since the last one was dismissed.
Will the new suit be filed in Alameda Superior Court again?
As indicated in the Requests For Qualifications, a local neighborhood
group filed a lawsuit challenging the adequacy of the approved
environmental impact report (EIR) for the project. On June
30, 2004, the Alameda Superior Court found in favor of the
campus and denied the challenge to the EIR.
In a newspaper article subsequent to the decision, the plaintiffs
stated their intent to appeal the decision of the Superior
Court. As of this writing (September 16, 2004), the campus
has not received notice of an appeal.
|
| September
14, 2004 |
Please
clarify the possible demand or desired mix of student apartment-style
housing -- 2 bedrooms/1 bath; 2 bedrooms/2 bath; 4 bedrooms/2
baths; etc. What square footage ranges should be assumed for
the above student unit types?
The campus anticipates a range of unit types and sizes based
on collaborative planning between the selected developer
and various campus constituents including the Office of
Student Affairs, Associated Students of the University of
California, Davis and the Graduate Student Association among
others. At this stage of the planning process, the campus
has no preconceived notions of the appropriate mix.
Page 2 of the mixed-use and student housing RFQ
identifies a market rate of $1,035 per month for unfurnished
two-bedroom apartment. Does that number include any utilities?
What might be the typical size of such a unit in Davis (rentable
square feet or gross)?
The figure cited in the RFQ is from the 2003 Davis Apartment
Vacancy and Rental Rate Report, prepared by the UC Davis
Student Housing office. The figure represents the average
monthly rental rate of 3,894 unfurnished two-bedroom apartments
surveyed in October and November 2003, and does not include
utilities. The report does not include information about
unit sizes.
Please identify development fees.
The university has prepared a preliminary financial feasibility
analysis indicating that total infrastructure costs, including
development fees, will be comparable to those of neighboring
jurisdictions. The scope and extent of such fees will be
one component of negotiations with the selected finalist
relating to sale prices or rental rates and a market rate
of return based on risk.
Please clarify utility operational fees.
Utility
rates for water, wastewater, and storm drainage will be
based on cost of service. Although specific rates have not
yet been determined, preliminary analysis indicates such
rates will be comparable if not less than rates in the city
of Davis.
|
| September
9, 2004 |
If
a developer will be submitting qualifications on both RFQs
is it necessary to submit qualifications on both, or can one
comprehensive submittal address both RFQs?
Developers
need not prepare separate submittals. A single comprehensive
submittal may address both RFQs.
Who
will be reviewing and judging the submittals?
A
committee of university staff will review the submittals
and determine the list of finalists to participate in the
proposal phase of the solicitation process. Committee members
will include representatives of the Office of Resource Management
and Planning, Real Estate Services, Student Affairs, and
General Counsel.
Will
the same panel or judges review both RFQ submittals or will
there be separate panels for each RFQ?
The
same panel will review both RFQs.
Is
it the university's intent to design and execute the installation
of infrastructure? If so, what infrastructure will be included?
The
university anticipates designing and installing backbone
infrastructure systems to a central location in the West
Village site, to which specific projects will connect. Backbone
infrastructure includes the widening and extension of Hutchison
Drive from Highway 113 into the site, domestic water, wastewater
collection, storm water retention and drainage including
ponds, electricity, natural gas, and telecommunications.
As noted in the RFQs, the campus will seek input from the
selected developer(s) in planning and design of such infrastructure.
How
flexible is the master plan in terms of adjusting the land
plan to increase density?
The
densities articulated in the master plan reflect a careful
balancing of competing issues identified during the process
of developing the plan. Such issues include minimizing land
consumption and impacts to surrounding agricultural uses,
reasonable compatibility with surrounding uses and the larger
community of Davis, construction costs and parking accommodations
required for higher density development, and creating high-quality
student environments. Importantly, the master plan adopted
by The Regents of the University of California includes
a certified environmental impact report (EIR). To the extent
that West Village remains within the general parameters
of the EIR (for example, total population or traffic generation),
subsequent environmental analysis will likely be less detailed
and less time-consuming. However, the university encourages
innovative designs. Within the parameters of the certified
EIR, the campus has flexibility to consider different configurations,
densities, etc.
Does
the university have a predetermined time frame on the term
of ground leases?
Ground
leases for faculty and staff units in Aggie Village have
99 year terms. The most recent third-party student housing
project on campus, the Colleges at La Rue, has a 65 year
ground lease. Ground leases for West Village will likely
be similar, but the campus is willing to discuss alternative
terms.
Are
there any restrictions (or guidance) on the page dimensions
of the RFQ package (i.e. letter, legal and/or 11X17 sheets
are acceptable)?
The
university encourages concise submittals that address the
identified requirements. We leave the precise content of
the submittal to each respondent's discretion.
|
| September
7, 2004 |
Will
the West Village developer be required to be construct the project
using prevailing wages?
The
University of California Office of the President is presently
reviewing the university's policy regarding payment of prevailing
wages for third-party development on university land. We
anticipate this issue will be resolved prior to the selected
finalists being asked to prepare proposals. Additional information
on this issue will be provided to selected finalists at
that time.
|
| August
27, 2004 |
The
RFQ requests developers to identify a minimum rate of return
(or range of rates) for this project, considering the various
aspects of the project that affect that return. Please clarify
whether the rate of return is return on project cost or return
on equity.
We
are primarily interested in knowing your approach to determining
a risk adjusted rate of return. At the later proposal stage,
selected finalists will be asked to provide project pro
formas, including profit. The proposals will form the basis
for negotiations of all business terms. At this qualifications
stage, however, we would like to know how the information
provided in the RFQ relating to the campus goals, proposed
development program, ground lease, and potential business
arrangement affects or adjusts your rate of return -- both
your return on total project cost and return on equity.
|
| August
16, 2004 |
What
assumptions are suggested for number of beds per dwelling
unit?
The
following assumptions were used in the environmental impact
report for the Neighborhood Master Plan:
- Single-family
detached homes: 2.5 persons per unit
- Townhouses:
2.5 persons per unit
- Faculty/staff
apartments: 2.5 persons per unit
- Mixed-use
center apartments: 2.5 persons per unit
- Student
apartments: 3.0 persons per unit
- Student
family apartments: 2.38 persons per unit
- Cottage
units: 1.5 persons per unit
While
these averages were used for impact assessment, the campus
anticipates working with the selected developer and campus
constituents to determine appropriate ranges of unit sizes
within all housing categories.
What
are the parking requirements per dwelling unit?
For
apartment housing, parking is assumed at a rate of three
spaces per four beds. The campus looks forward to developers
proposing innovative strategies to reduce parking need throughout
West Village.
Will
there be a pre-submittal briefing or conference prior to the
due date for qualifications?
There
will be no pre-submittal briefing or bidders conference
prior to the due date for qualifications.
Can
prospective bidders recieve a list of all persons receiving
the Request for Qualifications package?
The
campus has distributed more than a hundred RFQ packages.
We did not disclose to recipients that their names would
be revealed to other prospective respondents. We therefore
feel it would not be appropriate to distribute that information.
What
is the projected density for the single family homes, or units
per acre?
The
"Typical Design Characteristics"
section (Chapter 5) of the Neighborhood
Master Plan indicates a range of anticipated housing
densities as follows:
- "Main
Street" homes: 4 to 6 units per acre without cottages;
6 to 8 units per acre with cottages
- Detached
homes: 5.7 to 9.2 units per acre without cottages; 7.6
to 12.2 units per acre with cottages
- Townhouses:
15 to 20 units per acre without cottages
- Faculty/staff
apartments: 20 to 25 units per acre
- Mixed-use
housing: 20 to 25 units per acre
- Student
apartments: 25 to 35 units per acre
|
|
|